netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] iptables: lock free counters (alternate version)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4988B6BC.70006@hp.com>
Date:	Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:27:24 -0800
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iptables: lock free counters (alternate version)

So, is this patch stream at a point where I should try running the 32-core 
netperf tests against it?  And if so, against which tree should I try applying 
patches?

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html