[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ada63jqm2mt.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:19:06 -0800
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
zbr@...emap.net, jarkao2@...il.com, dada1@...mosbay.com,
ben@...s.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once
> And the arbitrary choice of 9k for jumbo frames was total crap too.
> It's clear that no hardware designer was involved in the process.
> They have to stuff 16kB of RAM on a NIC to use only 9. And we need
> to allocate 3 pages for slightly more than 2. 7.5 kB would have been
> better in this regard.
9K was not totally arbitrary. The CRC used for checksumming ethernet
packets has a probability of undetected errors that goes up about
11-thousand something bytes. So the real limit is ~11000 bytes, and I
believe ~9000 was chosen to be able to carry 8K NFS payloads + all XDR
and transport headers without fragmentation.
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists