netdev - Re: [PATCH] netns: remove useless synchronize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:50:53 +0100
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@....6wind.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netns: remove useless synchronize_net()

Le 06.02.2009 08:45, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@....6wind.com>
> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:21:22 +0100
> 
>> In dev_change_net_namespace(), synchronize_net() is called at the
>> end of the function, but there is no reason (no deletion occurs).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> 
> It is necessary to make sure all cpus stop looking at the
> previous namespace the device was attached to, and only
> see the new mapping.
I didn't really understand why it is 'necessary'.
If namespace is destroyed after this function, then cleanup_net() will ensure 
that nobody is looking at it
There is only two callers, rtnetlink and default_device_exit().


Thank you for your answer,
Nicolas

> 
> That's why this function has two synchronize_net() calls.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html