[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090208052543.GA20689@fieldses.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:25:43 -0500
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
chuck.lever@...cle.com, trond@...app.com,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c: some common code found
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 06:56:03PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> I personally think that people were honestly just mislead to think that
> diff-funcs output is part of the patch
Yes, exactly, in my case, that's all it was--the "diff" I thought I saw
in my 2-second skim looked odd, and I figured a comment might have
gotten dropped off in the process of replying and adding cc's--hence the
original question.
Anyway, the patch looks obviously fine to me, and the diff-func and
codiff output are helpful. (Where's diff-func from?)
In similar cases in the future, if you want to cater to the more tired
and/or mentally challenged among us (which may just be me), some clue
that visually distinguishes the quoted diff output in the comment might
help; e.g., maybe indent it like the below.
(But that's intended as a suggestion, not a requirement.)
--b.
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c: some common code found
diff-func output suggests these functions are very similar:
$ diff-funcs xs_udp_write_space net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
...(etc)
and codiff shows the space savings:
$ codiff net/sunrpc/xprtsock.o net/sunrpc/xprtsock.o.new
...(etc)
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists