[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090209061151.GA3982@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:11:51 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: commit 64ff3b938ec6782e6585a83d5459b98b0c3f6eb8 breaks rlogin
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:03:57PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> I would expect to see the URG packets from rlogin not rlogind, from
> things like hitting Ctrl-C etc.
That's what I thought too, however, the strace says otherwise:
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(513), sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.243.118")}, 16) = 0
write(3, "\0", 1) = 1
writev(3, [{"root\0", 5}, {"root\0", 5}, {"xterm/38400\0", 12}], 3) = 22
read(3, "\0", 1) = 1
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [USR1 URG], [USR1 URG], 8) = 0
setsockopt(3, SOL_IP, IP_TOS, [16], 4) = 0
setuid32(0) = 0
ioctl(0, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {SIG_IGN}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP], [USR1 URG], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGHUP, {0x8048bdc, [HUP], SA_RESTART}, {SIG_IGN}, 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGHUP, {SIG_IGN}, {0x8048bdc, [HUP], SA_RESTART}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [USR1 URG], [HUP USR1 URG], 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [QUIT], [USR1 URG], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGQUIT, {0x8048bdc, [QUIT], SA_RESTART}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [USR1 URG], [QUIT USR1 URG], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, {0x8049f20, [CHLD], SA_RESTART}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0
clone(child_stack=0, flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD, child_tidptr=0xb7d81918) = 6433
rt_sigaction(SIGURG, {0x80491d0, [URG], SA_RESTART}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGUSR1, {0x8048de0, [USR1], SA_RESTART}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], [USR1 URG], 8) = 0
--- SIGURG (Urgent I/O condition) @ 0 (0) ---
kill(6433, SIGURG) = 0
FD 3 is the TCP socket. As you can see, the only operations done
were write/writev/read/setsockopt. None of these can enter urgent
mode for sending, so that's how I concluded that my patch should
have zero effect on this side.
Note also that we got an SIGURG, which indicates that we received
urgent data.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists