[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49905298.80601@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:58:16 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT 3/3] iptables: lock free counters
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c 2009-01-29 11:09:20.720069979 -0800
> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c 2009-01-29 11:10:49.827070289 -0800
> @@ -347,9 +347,9 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
> mtpar.family = tgpar.family = NFPROTO_IPV4;
> tgpar.hooknum = hook;
>
> - read_lock_bh(&table->lock);
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> IP_NF_ASSERT(table->valid_hooks & (1 << hook));
> - private = table->private;
> + private = rcu_dereference(table->private);
> table_base = (void *)private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
> e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
I think this doesn't actually need the _bh rcu_read_lock() variant
since updates are never done in softirq context.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists