[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090209.180306.156744968.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:03:06 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: Santwona.Behera@....COM
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, gkernel-commit@...ts.sourceforge.net,
jeff@...zik.org, Matheos.Worku@....COM, Mehdi.Bonyadi@....COM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [ethtool] Add support for RX packet classification
in a network device
From: Santwona.Behera@....COM
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:12:21 -0800
> +struct ethtool_tcpip4_spec {
> + __u32 ip4src;
> + __u32 ip4dst;
> + __u16 psrc;
> + __u16 pdst;
> + __u8 tos;
> +};
The IP addresses and ports in these new interfaces, are
they to be specified in network or cpu byte order?
That's usually the first thing a person will wonder when
trying to use to implement support for these interfaces.
My guess is that the specification is cpu endianness,
however note that this flies in the face with how this
is handled in pretty much every other networking interface
in the kernel. The standard is to use network endianness
when passing ports and IP addressing information into the
kernel.
I wouldn't reject this patch series just for this reason,
in fact I'm ready to apply this stuff, but just thought I'd
mention it just in case you hadn't considered the issue
yourself.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists