netdev - Re: [BUG] SNAT sometimes allows packets to pass through unchanged

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0902121008050.2388-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:11:32 -0500 (EST)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] SNAT sometimes allows packets to pass through unchanged

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> If the connection has already timed out (from conntracks perspective),
> it has lost its state. Unless connection pickup is enabled, the packet 
> will be marked as INVALID because it doesn't belong to a connection.
> You can control dropping of these packets yourself by adding the
> appropriate "-m state --state INVALID" rules.

I tried adding a rule to log these unaccounted-for packets.  Nothing 
showed up, even when I could see the packets being sent.

> That said, there were
> some bugs in the past few releases that caused some bad interaction
> between TCP and TCP conntrack (not sure anymore which one of both was
> to blame). Its possible that this is the root cause for this, so
> you might want to consider a kernel update.

It does sound like the result of a bug.  Do you have any pointers to 
patches or locations to check in the source?

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html