[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090213142204.GA27554@ioremap.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:22:04 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Passive OS fingerprint xtables match.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:51:48PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt (jengelh@...ozas.de) wrote:
> >> config NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_COMMENT
> >> tristate '"comment" match support'
> >> depends on NETFILTER_ADVANCED
> >> ---help---
> >
> >But I placed OSF into net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_osf.c, should it be moved
> >into different location?
>
> That would be preferable -> net/netfilter/xt_osf.c.
Ok, I will move it there.
> >> >proper offset (modulo of the option size).
> >>
> >> What if optp is odd?
> >
> >It cant, header is fixed and every option length is also fixed (and its
> >size is checked).
>
> This RFC-compliant ("An option may begin on any octet boundary.")
> option byte stream seems to produce an odd optp value:
>
> 01 02 04 05 a0 00
>
> or where did I go wrong?
OSF checks only MSS and timestamp options.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists