netdev - Re: Passive OS fingerprint xtables match.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <499C228B.5000802@trash.net>
Date:	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:00:27 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
CC:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist 
	<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Passive OS fingerprint xtables match.

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Thursday 2009-02-12 19:57, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>>> Are you sure it is safe to use arch-dependent types like 'int'?
>> I would be very surprised if Linux will ever run on weird arch where int
>> is not 32 bits.
> 
> If GCC had a switch to compile with I16 or I64, I could test,
> but it does not. 'long', as used in the netfilter includes,
> already bit people in pre-2.6.19, and nowadays we have that compat
> crap thing in place.. Just don't take any chance, and go the safe
> route with uint32_t.

Tons of APIs will break when the size of int changes and differs
between userspace and kernel, this is a non-realistic risk in my
opinion. I do however prefer the fixed types myself since they
make the size more visible.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html