netdev - Re: Passive OS fingerprint xtables match.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:30:03 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist 
	<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Passive OS fingerprint xtables match.


On Wednesday 2009-02-18 16:07, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
>As of IPv6 support - it could be fairly trivial, the only thing we need
>is to dereference TCP header with the appropriate offset anf get don't
>fragment bit (ipv6 does not have it, so we could check both entries).

But IPv6 can have Fragment Headers, serving about the same purpose.

>But... I do not have IPv6 network to test the changes (and definitely
>did not have it 6 years ago), so it was never implemented :)

There exist lots of free VM solutions - and I think UML existed
6 years ago, too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html