[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499C3CC6.9020704@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:52:22 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match()
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Patrick McHardy a écrit :
>> In case of IPv4 and IPv6 they are already suitable aligned, it
>> simply performing the comparison in unsigned long quantities.
>> struct arpt_arp unfortunately doesn't properly align the interface
>> names, so we need to continue to do byte-wise comparisons.
>>
> I see, but #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS can help here ;)
get_unaligned() would work as well I guess. But we don't seem to
have a get_unaligned_long().
> ifname_compare() should be static in three files (ipv4_ip_tables, ipv6_ip_tables and arp_tables),
> since only arp_tables variant has the alignement problem.
>
> [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in arp_packet_match()
>
> x86 and powerpc can perform long word accesses in an efficient maner.
> We can use this to unroll two loops in arp_packet_match(), to
> perform arithmetic on long words instead of bytes. This is a win
> on x86_64 for example.
This looks good to me. Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists