netdev - Re: Why linux keeps connected routes when link goes down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200902191122.13106.homecreate@list.ru>
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:22:12 +0500
From:	Ханкин Константин 
	<homecreate@...t.ru>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why linux keeps connected routes when link goes down

> IP addresses are owned by the "host" rather than specific interfaces
> under Linux.  So just bringing an interface down does not disable
> IP addresses configured to that interface.
Well. Why routes are not in kernel table when interface is DOWN? And why 
routes are still alive if interface is UP, but not RUNNING?
I think it's right when I can't send anything through interface when there is 
no link. But now I have no link and a route to some network with the highest 
metric

--
Konstantin
E-mail homecreate@...t.ru
Jabber homecreate@...ber.ru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html