[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090220125942.GA16897@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:59:42 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Chu XJ <zhuxjc@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: a trivial bug in __copy_skb_header() ?
Em Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 04:45:33PM +0800, Chu XJ escreveu:
> Hi, all
>
> I'm just a newbie of Linux kernel from China. I just wonder
> whether it should be "#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM" at the 504th line of
> net/core/skbuff.c in the V2.6.28 source tree and previous version.
Fairly recent code:
static void __copy_skb_header(struct sk_buff *new, const struct sk_buff *old)
{
new->tstamp = old->tstamp;
new->dev = old->dev;
new->transport_header = old->transport_header;
new->network_header = old->network_header;
new->mac_header = old->mac_header;
new->dst = dst_clone(old->dst);
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
new->sp = secpath_get(old->sp);
#endif
memcpy(new->cb, old->cb, sizeof(old->cb));
new->csum_start = old->csum_start;
new->csum_offset = old->csum_offset;
new->local_df = old->local_df;
new->pkt_type = old->pkt_type;
new->ip_summed = old->ip_summed;
skb_copy_queue_mapping(new, old);
new->priority = old->priority;
Where do you think there is a problem?
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists