netdev - Re: [PATCH] iptables: lock free counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <499E04C9.4020308@hp.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:18:01 -0800
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iptables: lock free counters

>>>Thanks Stephen, thats very cool stuff, yet another rwlock out of kernel :)
>>
>>Do you folks need/want further testing against the 32-core setup?
> 
> 
> It would be good to combine all 3 (iptables-rcu, timer change, and conntrack lock)
> to see what the overhead change is.

Fair enough. Is there a tree somewhere I can pull with all those in it, or do I 
need to go back through the emails and apply patches?

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html