netdev - Re: Yet more fixes to etherh.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090222.043647.50635031.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:36:47 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	linux@....linux.org.uk
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: Yet more fixes to etherh.c

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:34:58 +0000

> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 04:29:52AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> > Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:46:01 +0000
> > 
> > > So, as far as I can see, I never sent you a patch for to fix the
> > > eth_set_mac_addr -> eth_mac_addr change.  If you have that in your
> > > tree, someone else must have sent it to you (maybe Stephen forwarded
> > > it?)
> > 
> > Nevermind, I see what happened, I got your commit when I merged
> > upstream into net-next-2.6 to resolve some merge conflicts.
> > 
> > Ok, I'll revert today's patch from my tree and let it propagate via
> > your's.
> 
> I don't mind how it gets in, as long as it does.  Since you seem happy
> for it to propagate via mine, can I assume you're acking it?

Yep

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html