[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090225084321.GA1101@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:43:21 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IPv4/IPv6 sysctl unregistration deadlock
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:18:47AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> Unfortunately its more complicated than I thought because of
> device renames, where the sysctl pointer is reused after
> unregistration and the rename/unregistration/re-registration
> should be atomic. Deferring unregistration means we can't perform
> the new registration immediately unless we allow multiple
> registrations for a single device to be active simulaneously,
> which introduces a whole new set of problems.
Good point.
> Simply ignoring the request during unregistration doesn't seem
> so bad after all, the main problem is that it intoduces a different
> race on renames where a write to the "forwarding" file returns
> success, but the change doesn't take effect. We could return
> -ENOENT, but that seems a bit strange after open() returned success.
> Maybe -EBUSY, although I would prefer to make this transparent
> to userspace.
I'd like to avoid that for the rename case just because shell
scripts know how to deal with echo foo > /nonexist/file but not
necessarily a failed echo on write/close.
> I think I'm stuck. Will rethink it after some coffee :)
Yes we need more coffee :)
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists