netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] tehuti: Use request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090225.213114.227259583.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:31:14 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ben@...adent.org.uk
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, baum@...utinetworks.net, andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tehuti: Use request_firmware()

From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:46:23 +0000

> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 00:08 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > Ben your two patches are HTML damanged, I see "=20" sequences
> > all over the place.  That could be my mailer, but...
> 
> I just tested with both mutt and Evolution, and they use quoted-
> printable for the body of signed messages (perhaps to avoid the risk of
> whitespace loss invalidating the signature).  So I suppose I'll have to
> leave patches unsigned.  Which sucks, frankly.

I don't care about the body, I can work around the commit
message text, it's just the patch.

Make it a binary attachment, surely mutt and Crapolution let
you do that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html