netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/26] Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS), take 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:01:50 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	andy.grover@...il.com
Cc:	andy.grover@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	rds-devel@....oracle.com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/26] Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS), take 2

From: Andrew Grover <andy.grover@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:43:27 -0800

> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:28 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > Furthermore the port you've choosen for the protocol is arbitrary, not
> > properly allocated with the appropriate standards committee, and
> > therefore could conflict with something other people are using.
> 
> I'm sure allocating the port won't be too big an issue.

Ok, I added the RDS code to the net-next-2.6 tree, changing
AF_RDS to be 21
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html