netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: more timeouts that reach -1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090227114015.M80857@cooldavid.org>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:43:44 +0800
From:	"Guo-Fu Tseng" <cooldavid@...ldavid.org>
To:	Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: more timeouts that reach -1

On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:15:57 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote
> These were not previously reported by me.
> ------------------------------>8-------------8<---------------------------------
> with while (timeout-- > 0); timeout reaches -1 after the loop, so the tests
> below are off by one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c |    2 +-
>  drivers/net/jme.c           |    3 ++-
>  drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c  |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c b/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
> index 1cf2f94..f3a1274 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
> @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ ks8695_reset(struct ks8695_priv *ksp)
>  		msleep(1);
>  	}
> 
> -	if (reset_timeout == 0) {
> +	if (reset_timeout < 0) {
>  		dev_crit(ksp->dev,
>  			 "Timeout waiting for DMA engines to reset\n");
>  		/* And blithely carry on */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/jme.c b/drivers/net/jme.c
> index 08b3405..0173ed0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/jme.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/jme.c
> @@ -957,7 +957,8 @@ jme_process_receive(struct jme_adapter *jme, int limit)
>  		goto out_inc;
> 
>  	i = atomic_read(&rxring->next_to_clean);
> -	while (limit-- > 0) {
> +	while (limit > 0) {
> +		limit--;
>  		rxdesc = rxring->desc;
>  		rxdesc += i;
> 
There should be no difference after this modification.
The return value of this function is: "limit > 0 ? limit : 0;"
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c b/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c
> index 5463591..7b1b46c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int uec_mdio_reset(struct mii_bus *bus)
> 
>  	mutex_unlock(&bus->mdio_lock);
> 
> -	if (timeout <= 0) {
> +	if (timeout < 0) {
>  		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: The MII Bus is stuck!\n", bus->name);
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Guo-Fu Tseng

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html