[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090227.052403.209887355.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:24:03 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: jarkao2@...il.com, ash@...sky.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel problem
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:45:50 +0800
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:03:50AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > This case should use netpoll_rx().
>
> Good point.
>
> > netif_rx_skb() --> netpoll_rx()
> > netif_receive_skb() --> netpoll_receive_skb()
>
> Actually I think we could just use netpoll_rx as netpoll_receive_skb
> is just an optimisation that skips the test if we've already done it.
>
> I'll do another version with combining the bonding check as you
> suggested.
Thanks a lot Herbert.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists