[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090227142754.GB17040@xi.wantstofly.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:27:54 +0100
From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
To: Gary Thomas <gary@...assoc.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 06:27:25AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >>> Also, can you show me what you're filling the dsa platform data
> >>> structure with?
> >> struct dsa_platform_data _switch_data = {
> >> .port_names[0] = "lan1.1",
> >> .port_names[1] = "lan1.2",
> >> .port_names[2] = "lan1.3",
> >> .port_names[3] = "lan1.4",
> >> .port_names[4] = "lan1.5",
> >> .port_names[5] = "lan1.6",
> >> .port_names[6] = "lan1.7",
> >> .port_names[7] = "lan1.8",
> >> .port_names[10] = "cpu",
> >> .sw_addr = 1,
> >> };
> >
> > Just this should do the trick. So what's not working -- are the
> > interfaces not showing up? Or packet RX/TX isn't working? Or
> > something else?
>
> It won't let me bring up eth0 (my scripts try to run DHCP):
> starting network interfaces...
> 24520:01 not found
> eth0: Could not attach to PHY
> ip: SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such device
>
> As for the other devices, they do show up if I let eth0 try to
> attach to the PHY:
OK. If you try to cheat the gianfar driver by having it attach to
the PHY for lan1.1, and plug a network cable into lan1.1 so that the
link goes up and gianfar thinks that the link on eth0 is up, does that
enable you to pass packets over any of the switch interfaces? That
should be working now in this stage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists