netdev - Re: [PATCH] iptables: new strict host model match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0902280923090.7746@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:27:04 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iptables: new strict host model match


On Saturday 2009-02-28 03:10, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Friday 2009-02-27 04:23, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> >> >+static struct xt_match strict_mt_reg __read_mostly = {
>> >> >+	.name		= "strict",
>> >> >+	.family		= NFPROTO_IPV4,
>> >> >+	.match		= strict_mt,
>> >> >+	.matchsize	= 0,
>> >> >+	.me		= THIS_MODULE,
>> >> >+};
>> >> 
>> >> The match seems to make the most sense where an input device
>> >> is available, so
>> >> 
>> >> 	.hooks = (1 << NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING) | (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) |
>> >> 	         (1 << NF_INET_FORWARD)
>> >> 
>> >> should probably be added.
>> >
>> >Then routing wouldn't work...
>> 
>I suppose it could be useful to to different chains for routed vs non-routed
>packets on pre-routing chain, but on forward chain it wouldn't really
>do anything useful.
>
...Ok? The hooks mask limits the use of the match to - true to its name -
hooks, so it is implies permitting the use of the match in the
PREROUTING/INPUT/FORWARD chain and chains called from it, as long as
no unlisted chain has a reference to it too. This is how most other
modules, e.g. xt_mac, act too.

Since xt_strict inspects in_dev, and in_dev is not available in
OUTPUT/POSTROUTING, I was suggesting to just limit its use to the
chains where in_dev != NULL.
Or did I misunderstood you?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html