| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:32:15 -0700
From: Gary Thomas <gary@...assoc.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...u.dk>
CC: jdb@...x.dk, Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?
Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Gary Thomas wrote:
>
>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>> Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:56 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You should write 0x003E ... see attached patch
>>>> Ups, I see (from the thread) that you have already done/tried this...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, although I think it will need some work in the future
>>> (I've set it to 1000Mb connection, you said you used 100Mb, etc)
>>>
>>> Question: I'm testing this by trying a ping out of my box.
>>> Linux replies by sending an ARP packet out, and the destination
>>> replies with an ARP packet in. I can see from the ethtool stats
>>> that the reply packets get into lan1.1 (the physical port I'm
>>> using), but I don't see them get moved through the CPU port.
>
> Well, thats a break through :-) If I understand you correctly, the
> destination host actually receives the ARP packet and responds with a
> packet.
>
> That should means that the outgoing DSA tagging is working. Although
> I'm not sure about the incomming...
>
>>> My understanding is that this should work via the VLAN map?
>
> I think that the "VLAN map/table" has gotten a wrong name as it does not
> really determine the VLANs, it only says who can talk to whom. The
> switch does support a real vlan setup, but its deactivated in Lennerts
> driver, as I guess he wants Linux to handle the VLANs. (I use the real
> VLAN setup extensively in my driver).
I agree that the simple mode Lennert's code uses is not VLAN on
the hardware, just internal switch path routes.
>>> I checked that setup and it looks OK.
>
> I have also checked the different registers setting, and things looks
> quite alright. Although I'm missing the register datasheets for the
> 6131 chip, I found that I only have part 1 of 3 crap...
>
> I did find that the 6095 and 6097 does differ in the way DSA handling is
> done, as the 6097 supports Ethertype DSA and 6095 don't. But the 6131
> driver looks like it does the right thing for the 6095.
I didn't look at the 6097 yet, but I have scoured the 6095 and 6131
data sheets and I can't see what's wrong. The differences between
these two parts are extremely minor - basically the number of ports
and which one might be used for the CPU.
>
>>> Any ideas where this might be going wrong?
>
> Is lan1.1 up and have you given it an IP address?
> (could I get a 'ifconfig' output?)
Yes it's up.
> Are you sending packets with VLAN tags?
No VLAN tagging (by Linux), just normal IPv4 packets. Here's what I did:
root@..._target:~ ifconfig eth0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1D:11:81:00:00
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1180 (1.1 KiB) TX bytes:1180 (1.1 KiB)
Base address:0x6000
root@..._target:~ ifconfig lan1.1 192.168.12.188 up
root@..._target:~ lan1.1: link up, 100 Mb/s, full duplex, flow control disabled
root@..._target:~ ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1D:11:81:00:00
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1180 (1.1 KiB) TX bytes:1180 (1.1 KiB)
Base address:0x6000
lan1.1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1D:11:81:00:00
inet addr:192.168.12.188 Bcast:192.168.12.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
root@..._target:~ ethtool -S lan1.1
NIC statistics:
tx_packets: 0
tx_bytes: 0
rx_packets: 0
rx_bytes: 0
in_good_octets: 2096784
in_bad_octets: 0
in_unicast: 3601
in_broadcasts: 528
in_multicasts: 70
in_pause: 0
in_undersize: 0
in_fragments: 0
in_oversize: 0
in_jabber: 0
in_rx_error: 0
in_fcs_error: 0
out_octets: 230866
out_unicast: 3595
out_broadcasts: 3
out_multicasts: 0
out_pause: 0
excessive: 0
collisions: 0
deferred: 0
single: 0
multiple: 0
out_fcs_error: 0
late: 0
hist_64bytes: 3705
hist_65_127bytes: 326
hist_128_255bytes: 159
hist_256_511bytes: 15
hist_512_1023bytes: 3592
hist_1024_max_bytes: 0
root@..._target:~ ethtool -S lan1.8
mv88e6131_get_ethtool_stats(7) => CPU
NIC statistics:
tx_packets: 0
tx_bytes: 0
rx_packets: 0
rx_bytes: 0
in_good_octets: 232054
in_bad_octets: 0
in_unicast: 3595
in_broadcasts: 5
in_multicasts: 0
in_pause: 0
in_undersize: 0
in_fragments: 0
in_oversize: 0
in_jabber: 0
in_rx_error: 0
in_fcs_error: 0
out_octets: 2021576
out_unicast: 3599
out_broadcasts: 9
out_multicasts: 1
out_pause: 0
excessive: 0
collisions: 0
deferred: 0
single: 0
multiple: 0
out_fcs_error: 0
late: 0
hist_64bytes: 3600
hist_65_127bytes: 9
hist_128_255bytes: 0
hist_256_511bytes: 4
hist_512_1023bytes: 3596
hist_1024_max_bytes: 0
root@..._target:~ ping -c 5 192.168.12.18
PING 192.168.12.18 (192.168.12.18): 56 data bytes
--- 192.168.12.18 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
root@..._target:~ ifconfig lan1.1
lan1.1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1D:11:81:00:00
inet addr:192.168.12.188 Bcast:192.168.12.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:252 (252.0 B)
root@..._target:~ ifconfig eth0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1D:11:81:00:00
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1180 (1.1 KiB) TX bytes:1456 (1.4 KiB)
Base address:0x6000
root@..._target:~ ethtool -S lan1.1
NIC statistics:
tx_packets: 6
tx_bytes: 252
rx_packets: 0
rx_bytes: 0
in_good_octets: 2099816
in_bad_octets: 0
in_unicast: 3607
in_broadcasts: 542
in_multicasts: 71
in_pause: 0
in_undersize: 0
in_fragments: 0
in_oversize: 0
in_jabber: 0
in_rx_error: 0
in_fcs_error: 0
out_octets: 231250
out_unicast: 3595
out_broadcasts: 9
out_multicasts: 0
out_pause: 0
excessive: 0
collisions: 0
deferred: 0
single: 0
multiple: 0
out_fcs_error: 0
late: 0
hist_64bytes: 3718
hist_65_127bytes: 331
hist_128_255bytes: 168
hist_256_511bytes: 15
hist_512_1023bytes: 3592
hist_1024_max_bytes: 0
root@..._target:~ ethtool -S lan1.8
mv88e6131_get_ethtool_stats(7) => CPU
NIC statistics:
tx_packets: 0
tx_bytes: 0
rx_packets: 0
rx_bytes: 0
in_good_octets: 232438
in_bad_octets: 0
in_unicast: 3595
in_broadcasts: 11
in_multicasts: 0
in_pause: 0
in_undersize: 0
in_fragments: 0
in_oversize: 0
in_jabber: 0
in_rx_error: 0
in_fcs_error: 0
out_octets: 2021576
out_unicast: 3599
out_broadcasts: 9
out_multicasts: 1
out_pause: 0
excessive: 0
collisions: 0
deferred: 0
single: 0
multiple: 0
out_fcs_error: 0
late: 0
hist_64bytes: 3606
hist_65_127bytes: 9
hist_128_255bytes: 0
hist_256_511bytes: 4
hist_512_1023bytes: 3596
hist_1024_max_bytes: 0
You can see that lan1.1 "in_unicast" changed by 6 packets. These
correspond to the ARP reply packets I see the destination host
(192.168.12.18) send out.
>
>> I also just noticed that the ESA registers (Global 1,2,3)
>> aren't set at all. I'm pretty sure that the way I'm using
>> the switch in my bootloader this doesn't matter as all packets
>> have a fixed routing and the ESA recognition happens at the
>> actual ethernet device.
>
> Don't think the switch needs a MAC address...
>
>> Is this going to cause problems with the VLAN (+DSA) based
>> routing?
>
> Don't think so...
I added in the correct ESA on the switch and the lan1.1
incoming counters now track the unicode packets. Since I
still can't get them through to the CPU port, I don't
know if this was important.
Any ideas how I might troubleshoot why packets that come
into lan1.1 (port 0) aren't being pushed to the CPU port?
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists