[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090302.035735.240266876.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:57:35 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/17] tcp: remove pointless .dsack code
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:54:17 +0200 (EET)
> We'll be dirty it anyway (not that I check), the first "real" statement
> in tcp_rcv_established is:
>
> tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
>
> ...that'll land on the same dword. :-/
>
> I suppose the blocks are there just because they had more complexity
> inside when they had to calculate the eff_sacks too (maybe it would
> have been better to just remove them in that drop-patch so you would
> have had less head-ache :-)).
That sounds like a good commit log entry for when you resubmit
this patch :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists