netdev - Re: [PATCH] iptables: lock free counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49AC1B9D.5030107@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:47:09 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iptables: lock free counters

Patrick McHardy a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> # time iptables -nvL
>> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 416M packets, 64G bytes)
>>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source              
>> destination
>>
>> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
>>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source              
>> destination
>>
>> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 401M packets, 62G bytes)
>>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source              
>> destination
>>
>> real    0m1.810s
>> user    0m0.000s
>> sys     0m0.001s
> 
> Thats really slow ...
> 
>> CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
>> CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
>> CONFIG_HZ=1000
>>
>> One cpu is 100% handling softirqs, could it be the problem ?
> 
> Is this fixed by your RCU quiescent state fix?

Yes it is :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html