netdev - Re: [PATCH] dccp: ensure gap does not become unsigned -1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <35998.148.187.160.35.1236167139.squirrel@148.187.160.35>
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:45:39 -0000 (GMT)
From:	gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk
To:	"Roel Kluin" <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, acme@...stprotocols.net,
	dccp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dccp: ensure gap does not become unsigned -1

[added missing copy to netdev@...r]

> Is this maybe necessary?
> ------------------------------>8-------------8<---------------------------------
> if packets is 0, becomes -1, but since gap is unsigned, the test 'gap > 0'
> does not work.
>
Thank you for looking through. It is not necessary, see below.

> --- a/net/dccp/ackvec.c
> +++ b/net/dccp/ackvec.c
> @@ -207,7 +207,11 @@ static inline int
> dccp_ackvec_set_buf_head_state(struct dccp_ackvec *av,
>  	if (av->av_vec_len + packets > DCCP_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN)
>  		return -ENOBUFS;
>
> -	gap	 = packets - 1;
> +	if (packets > 0)

Why 'gap < 0' <=> packets < 0 can not happen:

/*
 * If several packets are missing, the HC-Receiver may prefer to enter
multiple
 * bytes with run length 0, rather than a single byte with a larger run
length;
 * this simplifies table updates if one of the missing packets arrives.
 */
static inline int dccp_ackvec_set_buf_head_state(struct dccp_ackvec *av,
                                                 const unsigned int packets,
                                                 const unsigned char state)

This is a static routine which is called in one place only in
net/dccp/ackvec.c, in dccp_ackvec_add():
//...
} else if (after48(ackno, av->av_buf_ackno)) {
                const u64 delta = dccp_delta_seqno(av->av_buf_ackno, ackno);

                /*
                 * Look if the state of this packet is the same as the
                 * previous ackno and if so if we can bump the head len.
                 */
                if (delta == 1 &&
                    dccp_ackvec_state(av, av->av_buf_head) == state &&
                    dccp_ackvec_len(av, av->av_buf_head) <
DCCP_ACKVEC_LEN_MASK)
                        av->av_buf[av->av_buf_head]++;
                else if (dccp_ackvec_set_buf_head_state(av, delta, state))
                        return -ENOBUFS;

==> We thus have:
 1) after48(a, b) => sequence number `a' is `after' b
 2) sequence number `a' is `after' `b' =>  dccp_delta_seqno(b, a) > 0
 3) hence delta > 0
 4) hence delta - 1 = gap >= 0
 5) The subsequent `else' in dccp_ackvec_add() catches the case
    of !after48(a, b), note the reversed order of arguments to
    dccp_delta_seqno, so that a positive value is returned:

    } else {
                /*
                 * A.1.2.  Old Packets
                 *
                 *      When a packet with Sequence Number S <= buf_ackno
                 *      arrives, the HC-Receiver will scan the table for
                 *      the byte corresponding to S. (Indexing structures
                 *      could reduce the complexity of this scan.)
                 */
                u64 delta = dccp_delta_seqno(ackno, av->av_buf_ackno);


    ==> But this is in an entirely different block of code outside the
        one to which this patch was meant.

Hence it is not necessary.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html