lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090304225156.GE6392@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:51:56 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	nhorman@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [Patch 3/5] Network Drop Monitor: Adding kfree_skb_clean for
	non-drops and modifying end-of-line points for skbs

Em Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:47:22PM -0800, David Miller escreveu:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:45:05 -0300
> 
> > hasta_la_vista_skbaby()
> 
> This is my personal favorite, it's very Mexifornia.

ROTFL, I have to get that book someday... For now I'm reading a brick
about post-'45 Europe :-)
 
> > consumed_skb()
> 
> But more seriously I like something like "consume_skb()" the best (ie.
> drop the 'd').  It has the implication that an application or other
> entity "consumed" and used the data before we freed the SKB.
> 
> What do you think?

That would be better than kfree_skb_clean, yes.

- Arnaldo

P.S.: Neil, I didn't managed to get to the other aspects of your work,
sorry about being so picky :-\
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ