netdev - Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49B581D3.6060807@krogh.cc>
Date:	Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:53:39 +0100
From:	Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>
To:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>, aowi@...ozymes.com
Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected
 - twice

Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> 	However, I did find another bug I introduced during the "mii
> refactor" patch that you mentioned as being the original source of the
> problem.  That bug will cause 802.3ad to not notice speed changes.
> 
> 	Could you test the patch below on your 2.6.68.7 and/or 2.6.27.19
> and see if it resolves your problem (without the forcedeth patch)?

There was something missing from the header to make it compile.. I found 
that in a later version. Patch below fixed the problem (without the 
forcedeth patch).

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c 
b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 1b9c4dc..fd61dfb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3516,11 +3516,27 @@ static int bond_slave_netdev_event(unsigned long 
event, struct net_device *slave
                 }
                 break;
         case NETDEV_CHANGE:
-               /*
-                * TODO: is this what we get if somebody
-                * sets up a hierarchical bond, then rmmod's
-                * one of the slave bonding devices?
-                */
+               if (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_8023AD ||
+                   bond_is_lb(bond)) {
+                       struct slave *slave;
+
+                       slave = bond_get_slave_by_dev(bond, slave_dev);
+                       if (slave) {
+                               u16 old_speed = slave->speed;
+                               u16 old_duplex = slave->duplex;
+
+                               bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
+
+                               if (bond_is_lb(bond))
+                                       break;
+
+                               if (old_speed != slave->speed)
+ 
bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed(slave);
+                               if (old_duplex != slave->duplex)
+ 
bond_3ad_adapter_duplex_changed(slave);
+                       }
+               }
+
                 break;
         case NETDEV_DOWN:
                 /*
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
index fb730ec..b1315e4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
@@ -248,6 +248,14 @@ static inline struct bonding 
*bond_get_bond_by_slave(struct slave *slave)
         return (struct bonding *)slave->dev->master->priv;
  }

+static inline bool bond_is_lb(const struct bonding *bond)
+{
+        return bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_TLB
+                || bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ALB;
+}
+
+
+
  #define BOND_FOM_NONE                  0
  #define BOND_FOM_ACTIVE                        1
  #define BOND_FOM_FOLLOW                        2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html