netdev - Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090310094312.GL4738@xi.wantstofly.org>
Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:43:12 +0100
From:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
To:	Gary Thomas <gary@...assoc.com>
Cc:	jdb@...x.dk, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...u.dk>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?

On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:22:17AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:

> >>> You should write 0x003E ... see attached patch
> >> Ups, I see (from the thread) that you have already done/tried this...
> > 
> > Yes, although I think it will need some work in the future
> > (I've set it to 1000Mb connection, you said you used 100Mb, etc)
> > 
> > Question: I'm testing this by trying a ping out of my box.
> > Linux replies by sending an ARP packet out, and the destination
> > replies with an ARP packet in.  I can see from the ethtool stats
> > that the reply packets get into lan1.1 (the physical port I'm
> > using), but I don't see them get moved through the CPU port.
> > My understanding is that this should work via the VLAN map?
> > I checked that setup and it looks OK.
> > 
> > Any ideas where this might be going wrong?
> 
> I also just noticed that the ESA registers (Global 1,2,3)
> aren't set at all.

This is done by mv88e6xxx_set_addr_{in,}direct() in mv88e6xxx.c,
via the ->set_addr() callback.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html