[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49B6420B.4080309@free.fr>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:33:47 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...nvz.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality
for DCCP protocol
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> Module specific data moved into per-net site and being allocated/freed
>> during net namespace creation/deletion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
>> ---
>> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c | 148
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>>
>> static int __init nf_conntrack_proto_dccp_init(void)
>> {
>> int err;
>>
>> - err = nf_conntrack_l4proto_register(&dccp_proto4);
>> + err = register_pernet_gen_device(&dccp_net_id, &dccp_net_ops);
>>
[ cut ]
> Shouldn't it be register_pernet_gen_subsys ?
If you use register_pernet_gen_device, your subsystem will be deleted
before the network devices and potentially you can receive a packet even
if your subsystem is already freed.
Eric did a fix for tcp and icmp a few weeks ago. I thing its explanation
is better than mine :)
it is the commit 6eb0777228f31932fc941eafe8b08848466630a1 for net-2.6
Thanks.
-- Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists