netdev - Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090310.042537.49464370.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	daniel.lezcano@...e.fr
Cc:	gorcunov@...il.com, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...nvz.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
	gorcunov@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality
 for DCCP protocol

From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:19:18 +0100

> >  static int __init nf_conntrack_proto_dccp_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	int err;
> >  -	err = nf_conntrack_l4proto_register(&dccp_proto4);
> > +	err = register_pernet_gen_device(&dccp_net_id, &dccp_net_ops);
> >   
> 
> Shouldn't it be register_pernet_gen_subsys ?

Do I really have to carefully and meticuliously scan down
hundreds and hundreds of irrelevant quoted patch text just
to see what bit you're commenting on?

Please, just provide the necessary context of the patch for
your comments, don't quote the whole thing :-(

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html