netdev - Re: XFRM state hash value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090310.071841.10239678.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nicolas.dichtel@....6wind.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFRM state hash value

From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@....6wind.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:08:16 +0100

> This patch is ok with my test case.
> I'm asking me if we should perform the step with saddr_wildcard if we have already found one. The state with a src address may have an higher priority than the state with a wildcare address, no?

Good point, I'll think about the semantics and update my patch
as necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html