lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40903101013j2324e8acw18830c930e12ae46@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:13:02 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Henk Stegeman <henk.stegeman@...il.com>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...l.org,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: net_device_ops support in bridging and fec_mpc52xx.c

Hi Henk,

Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>

Can you please repost with a blurb for the commit description and your
signed-off-by line?  The blub below makes sense in the context of this
mailing list thread, but it won't be very useful for someone looking
at the commit message in git.  Also, your patch is line-wrap damaged
(cut and paste into your mail client doesn't usually work) and has
inconsistent whitespace (run it through scripts/checkpatch.pl).

Jeff, after Henk provides his s-o-b line, do you want to pick it up,
or should I merge it through my mpc52xx powerpc tree (via benh).

Thanks,
g.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Henk Stegeman <henk.stegeman@...il.com> wrote:
> I must have made a mistake when I tested the previous patch, I
> discovered later it still had errors:
> - I had accidentally removed the base address in the fec_mpc52xx driver.
> - The priv->phydev pointer was sometimes not initialized (NULL) but
> still passed by the fec_mpc52xx driver, this pointer is then used
> unchecked by the eth_tool_* functions (used by bridging to determine
> port priority). As far as I see this depends on whether
> mpc52xx_fec_open (or mpc52xx_fec_close) is called which in turn call
> mpc52xx_init_phy to initialize priv->phydev. My work around checks the
> priv->phydev pointer in the fec_mpc52xx driver and returns -ENODEV to
> indicate there's no physical device. Big chance this is not the right
> way to handle the problem, but it works, hopefully someone with some
> more fundamental Linux network driver experience can pick this up or
> give me some hints on this.
>
> At least bridging now works on my board in combination with the
> fec_mpc52xx driver.
>
> ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 down
> ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 down
> brctl addbr br0
> brctl setfd br0 0
> brctl stp br0 off
> ifconfig br0 192.168.1.30 down
> ifconfig br0 up
> brctl addif br0 eth0
> ifconfig eth0 up
> brctl addif br0 eth1
> ifconfig eth1 up
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c b/drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c
> index cd8e98b..e228973 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c
> @@ -847,24 +847,40 @@ static void mpc52xx_fec_get_drvinfo(struct
> net_device *dev,
>  static int mpc52xx_fec_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct
> ethtool_cmd *cmd)
>  {
>        struct mpc52xx_fec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +       if (!priv->phydev)
> +                       return -ENODEV;
> +
>        return phy_ethtool_gset(priv->phydev, cmd);
>  }
>
>  static int mpc52xx_fec_set_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct
> ethtool_cmd *cmd)
>  {
>        struct mpc52xx_fec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +       if (!priv->phydev)
> +                       return -ENODEV;
> +
>        return phy_ethtool_sset(priv->phydev, cmd);
>  }
>
>  static u32 mpc52xx_fec_get_msglevel(struct net_device *dev)
>  {
>        struct mpc52xx_fec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +       if (!priv->phydev)
> +               return 0;
> +
>        return priv->msg_enable;
>  }
>
>  static void mpc52xx_fec_set_msglevel(struct net_device *dev, u32 level)
>  {
>        struct mpc52xx_fec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +       if (!priv->phydev)
> +                       return;
> +
>        priv->msg_enable = level;
>  }
>
> @@ -882,12 +898,31 @@ static int mpc52xx_fec_ioctl(struct net_device
> *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
>  {
>        struct mpc52xx_fec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>
> +       if (!priv->phydev)
> +                       return -ENODEV;
> +
>        return mpc52xx_fec_phy_mii_ioctl(priv, if_mii(rq), cmd);
>  }
>
>  /* ======================================================================== */
>  /* OF Driver                                                                */
>  /* ======================================================================== */
> +static const struct net_device_ops mpc52xx_fec_netdev_ops = {
> +       .ndo_open               = mpc52xx_fec_open,
> +       .ndo_stop               = mpc52xx_fec_close,
> +       .ndo_start_xmit         = mpc52xx_fec_hard_start_xmit,
> +       .ndo_tx_timeout         = mpc52xx_fec_tx_timeout,
> +       .ndo_get_stats          = mpc52xx_fec_get_stats,
> +       .ndo_set_multicast_list = mpc52xx_fec_set_multicast_list,
> +       .ndo_validate_addr      = eth_validate_addr,
> +       .ndo_set_mac_address    = mpc52xx_fec_set_mac_address,
> +       .ndo_do_ioctl           = mpc52xx_fec_ioctl,
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> +       .ndo_poll_controller     = mpc52xx_fec_poll_controller,
> +#endif
> +};
> +
>
>  static int __devinit
>  mpc52xx_fec_probe(struct of_device *op, const struct of_device_id *match)
> @@ -929,20 +964,10 @@ mpc52xx_fec_probe(struct of_device *op, const
> struct of_device_id *match)
>                return -EBUSY;
>
>        /* Init ether ndev with what we have */
> -       ndev->open              = mpc52xx_fec_open;
> -       ndev->stop              = mpc52xx_fec_close;
> -       ndev->hard_start_xmit   = mpc52xx_fec_hard_start_xmit;
> -       ndev->do_ioctl          = mpc52xx_fec_ioctl;
>        ndev->ethtool_ops       = &mpc52xx_fec_ethtool_ops;
> -       ndev->get_stats         = mpc52xx_fec_get_stats;
> -       ndev->set_mac_address   = mpc52xx_fec_set_mac_address;
> -       ndev->set_multicast_list = mpc52xx_fec_set_multicast_list;
> -       ndev->tx_timeout        = mpc52xx_fec_tx_timeout;
>        ndev->watchdog_timeo    = FEC_WATCHDOG_TIMEOUT;
>        ndev->base_addr         = mem.start;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> -       ndev->poll_controller = mpc52xx_fec_poll_controller;
> -#endif
> +       ndev->netdev_ops = &mpc52xx_fec_netdev_ops;
>
>        priv->t_irq = priv->r_irq = ndev->irq = NO_IRQ; /* IRQ are free for now */
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:48 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Henk Stegeman <henk.stegeman@...il.com>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:41:14 +0100
>>
>> Please CC: netdev, now added, on all networking reports and patches.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>> I discovered the hard way that because linux bridging uses
>>> net_device_ops, bridging only works with network drivers that publish
>>> their device operations trough net_device_ops.
>>>
>>> In my case running:
>>>
>>> brctl addif br0 eth0 (where eth0 fec_mpc52xx.c did not yet support
>>> net_device_ops) gave me a:
>>>
>>> Unable to handle kernel paging request...
>>>
>>> After changing fec_mpc52xx.c to support net_device_ops the problem was fixed.
>>>
>>> If possible some kind of detection in the bridging software is i think
>>> mostly appreciated for early detection of this problem, as it is
>>> pretty hard to relate the error message to a not updated driver.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> Henk
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c b/drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c
>>> index cd8e98b..a2841eb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c
>>> @@ -888,6 +888,22 @@ static int mpc52xx_fec_ioctl(struct net_device
>>> *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
>>>  /* ======================================================================== */
>>>  /* OF Driver                                                                */
>>>  /* ======================================================================== */
>>> +static const struct net_device_ops mpc52xx_fec_netdev_ops = {
>>> +       .ndo_open               = mpc52xx_fec_open,
>>> +       .ndo_stop               = mpc52xx_fec_close,
>>> +       .ndo_start_xmit         = mpc52xx_fec_hard_start_xmit,
>>> +       .ndo_tx_timeout         = mpc52xx_fec_tx_timeout,
>>> +       .ndo_get_stats          = mpc52xx_fec_get_stats,
>>> +       .ndo_set_multicast_list = mpc52xx_fec_set_multicast_list,
>>> +       .ndo_validate_addr      = eth_validate_addr,
>>> +       .ndo_set_mac_address    = mpc52xx_fec_set_mac_address,
>>> +       .ndo_do_ioctl           = mpc52xx_fec_ioctl,
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
>>> +       .ndo_poll_controller     = mpc52xx_fec_poll_controller,
>>> +#endif
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>
>>>  static int __devinit
>>>  mpc52xx_fec_probe(struct of_device *op, const struct of_device_id *match)
>>> @@ -929,20 +945,7 @@ mpc52xx_fec_probe(struct of_device *op, const
>>> struct of_device_id *match)
>>>               return -EBUSY;
>>>
>>>       /* Init ether ndev with what we have */
>>> -     ndev->open              = mpc52xx_fec_open;
>>> -     ndev->stop              = mpc52xx_fec_close;
>>> -     ndev->hard_start_xmit   = mpc52xx_fec_hard_start_xmit;
>>> -     ndev->do_ioctl          = mpc52xx_fec_ioctl;
>>> -     ndev->ethtool_ops       = &mpc52xx_fec_ethtool_ops;
>>> -     ndev->get_stats         = mpc52xx_fec_get_stats;
>>> -     ndev->set_mac_address   = mpc52xx_fec_set_mac_address;
>>> -     ndev->set_multicast_list = mpc52xx_fec_set_multicast_list;
>>> -     ndev->tx_timeout        = mpc52xx_fec_tx_timeout;
>>> -     ndev->watchdog_timeo    = FEC_WATCHDOG_TIMEOUT;
>>> -     ndev->base_addr         = mem.start;
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
>>> -     ndev->poll_controller = mpc52xx_fec_poll_controller;
>>> -#endif
>>> +     ndev->netdev_ops = &mpc52xx_fec_netdev_ops;
>>>
>>>       priv->t_irq = priv->r_irq = ndev->irq = NO_IRQ; /* IRQ are free for now */
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>>> Linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
>>> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ