[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090311.064710.255854254.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi
Subject: Re: [RFC] tcp: allow timestamps even if SYN packet has tsval=0
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:17:54 +0100
> So apparently WindowsXP sends a NULL tsval in SYN packet, then
> subsequent packets get a real value (60498) in this case.
>
> This seems to work on other OS as well, so is the following patch
> considered evil ? Do we have security concerns or only risking
> windows client to have slightly wrong rtt estimation at the begining
> of the tcp session ?
I think we'll have to accept this.
I don't see other systems blocking initial ts_ecn values of
zero like we do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists