Message-ID: <20090312151211.GB24995@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:12:11 -0400
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, shemminger@...tta.com,
	s.hauer@...gutronix.de, yanok@...raft.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	wd@...x.de, dzu@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dnet: Dave DNET ethernet controller driver

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 03:21:47PM +0100, Christer Weinigel wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:41:24 +0100
>>
>>> 1. The bootloader can pass a command line to the kernel and it is saved in non-volatile storage that can be changed from the bootloader
>>>
>>> 2. I can not modify the bootloader
>>>
>>> 3. I can modify the Linux kernel
>>>
>>> 4. The manufacturer has hardcoded a MAC address in the ethernet driver
>>>
>>> 5. I want to use NFS root to make it easy to develop on the platform
>>>
>>> 6. We get a second board so the hardcoded MAC addresses collide
>>
>> This is getting rediculious.
>
> Yes, ridiculous in the complexity of the workarounds for not having a  
> generic way to set the mac address from the command line.  :-/
>
You do have a generic way, via the initramfs.  Works great, every time.

>> If you can modify the kernel, you can have the kernel look in the
>> non-volatile storage for the MAC address and export that information
>> to the ethernet driver.
>
> Which means that the non-volatile storage must be available through a  
> Linux driver before the MAC address is set.  AFAIK there is no guarantee  
> that the MTD layer will be ready to use by that time.  And that is  
> assuming that there actually is a MTD driver available, usually when I  
> work on a Linux port for a reference board, the first thing I do is to  
> get a NFS root up and running, then I can put a have a complete Debian  
> system with all nice debugging tools available.  When I have that up and  
> running I start porting the other drivers, such as the MTD driver.
>
If you have an MTD driver ported, then it is available if you use an initramfs.
If you don't have an initramfs, you can still use your kernel command line
mechanism to set your network interface MAC address.

> Also, I don't really want to spend time on reverse engineering some  
> random non-volatile storage format, that's quite fragile.
>
Then dont, if you are only guaranteed one interface, use the kernel command
line to specify the mac and set it with ifconfig from an initramfs.

>> Or, you can parse the command line in your platform specific code
>> and program the MAC address into the chip.
>
> Which is actually what I'm doing, except that it's easier to hack that  
> into the ethernet driver each time it is needed.
>
What exactly is so difficult about cpio-ing up an initramfs to do this work with
sed and ifconfig? You make it sound like its an impossible barrier. Its really
quite simple

>> In fact there are many reasonable ways to solve the problem in
>> your scenerio, and none of them require device driver command
>> line option handler.
>
> Yes, that why I'd want that in a generic piece of code instead of having  
> to hack it into each device driver.  Would a generic command line  
> option, something like "ethaddrs=eth0=00:de:ad:be:ef:01" which assigns  
> addresses to network cards be acceptable?
>
> Next time I have to port something to an embedded platform with this  
> kind of problem, I might try to do something more generic instead of the  
> simple hack I usually do now.
>
You've convinced yourself that theres no other way to do this.  What exactly is
your opposition to an initramfs? I just built busybox with ifconfig, sed and ash
in a static binary.  The whole thing comes out at 800kb, and is compressed to
400kb.  You could probably save an extra hundred kb or so if you went with msh
instead or something.  Are you quite sure that your NV storage for your kernel
doesn't have an extra 400kb to spare for an initramfs?  I assume that it must,
since eventually you'll need an initramfs anyway to run the production variant
of the system your building (I imagine they won't all ship with an NFS server in
tow :) ).

Neil

>   /Christer
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists