[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090312131306.260cf3ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:13:06 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, cristiklein@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12860] New: SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF must be
set before connect() or listen()
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12860
>
> Summary: SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF must be set before connect() or
> listen()
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.18
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: IPV4
> AssignedTo: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
> ReportedBy: cristiklein@...il.com
>
>
> Problem Description:
>
> Calling setsockopt() with SO_RCVBUF or SO_SNDBUF after connect() or listen()
> makes sockets have a horrible performance. Moreover, getsockopt() returns
> values as if the previous setsockopt() was successful.
>
> Solution:
>
> 1) Document this somewhere in the man-pages (e.g. socket(7))
> 2) Make setsockopt() fail after connect() or listen()
>
> If you need an example code, I'll be happy to provide it.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists