[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090313.115458.168786837.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: paul.moore@...com
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] lsm: Relocate the IPv4
security_inet_conn_request() hooks
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:22:57 -0400
> The current placement of the security_inet_conn_request() hooks do not allow
> individual LSMs to override the IP options of the connection's request_sock.
> This is a problem as both SELinux and Smack have the ability to use labeled
> networking protocols which make use of IP options to carry security attributes
> and the inability to set the IP options at the start of the TCP handshake is
> problematic.
>
> This patch moves the IPv4 security_inet_conn_request() hooks past the code
> where the request_sock's IP options are set/reset so that the LSM can safely
> manipulate the IP options as needed. This patch intentionally does not change
> the related IPv6 hooks as IPv6 based labeling protocols which use IPv6 options
> are not currently implemented, once they are we will have a better idea of
> the correct placement for the IPv6 hooks.
This looks OK to me:
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists