netdev - Re: build bug on kfree(struct sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1237145608.4209.49.camel@hashbaz.i.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:33:28 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: build bug on kfree(struct sk_buff*)

On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 17:42 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> I noticed that my initial attempt was invalid. The one below appears to be
> correct, although I am not sure whether there is a better implementation.
> 
> this patch also fixes a kfree(skb) in net/core/dev.c, what do you think?
[...]

There are many types that should not be allocated and freed using the
general-purpose heap functions.  Why provide this check only for struct
skbuff?

Perhaps you should try to find a general way of detecting this, such as
a type annotation for sparse.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html