[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49BE74CC.8060701@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:48:28 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
xemul@...nvz.org, adobriyan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/7] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality
for SCTP protocol
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Patrick McHardy - Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:35:11PM +0100]
> ...
>> +#define ___PERNET_TO_DAT(i, j) \
>>> + sn->compat_sysctl_table[i].data = &sn->sctp_timeouts[j]
>>> +
>>> + ___PERNET_TO_DAT(0, SCTP_CONNTRACK_CLOSED);
>>> + ___PERNET_TO_DAT(1, SCTP_CONNTRACK_COOKIE_WAIT);
>>> + ___PERNET_TO_DAT(2, SCTP_CONNTRACK_COOKIE_ECHOED);
>>> + ___PERNET_TO_DAT(3, SCTP_CONNTRACK_ESTABLISHED);
>>> + ___PERNET_TO_DAT(4, SCTP_CONNTRACK_SHUTDOWN_SENT);
>>> + ___PERNET_TO_DAT(5, SCTP_CONNTRACK_SHUTDOWN_RECD);
>>> + ___PERNET_TO_DAT(6, SCTP_CONNTRACK_SHUTDOWN_ACK_SENT);
>>> +
>>> +#undef ___PERNET_TO_DAT
>> This is really ugly and is somewhat risky since those magic offsets need
>> to be kept in sync. Any chance (I don't have a suggestion currently) to
>> do this in a nicer way?
>>
>
> Give me some time Patrick, will try. Actually initial idea
> of these macros was to eliminate 'possible' problems caused
> by for (;;) form (enum could be rearranged and we will fail
> silently).
The state enums are pretty much set in stone as they're part of the
userspace ABI.
> So I guess the some 'new' form of template would
> help (instead of current "ctrl table as a templae"). So
> will return with new proposal. Thanks for review!
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists