[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49BE9A6E.4030904@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:29:02 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
xemul@...nvz.org, adobriyan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/7] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality
for SCTP protocol
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> After playing a bit with ctrl tables (thought about additional
> mapping set or say new sysctl helper structure, or even using
> extra1 member from struct ctl_table as temporary index) --
> you were right in your first propose on this patch. Iterative
> fasion is only more or less convenient here indeed :)
>
> Patrick, take a look please on the snippet below (that is how
> it looks now).
> ...
> + for (i = SCTP_CONNTRACK_CLOSED; i < SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX; i++)
> + sn->sysctl_table[i - 1].data = &sn->sctp_timeouts[i];
That definitely looks nicer. Does this work (-1) for the other
protocols as well?
> If such an approach is fine -- I will fix the TCP proto
> as well. Btw, this two patches (SCTP and TCP) are only
> involved in such a modification, are there some problems
> with patches for UDP, UDPlite and ICMP protos?
Its better than the macro and I don't really see a better way, so
this is fine with me. About the other patches - I just stopped at
SCTP since it was the first one I truely didn't like :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists