lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49BE9A6E.4030904@trash.net>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:29:02 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	xemul@...nvz.org, adobriyan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/7] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net	functionality
 for SCTP protocol

Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> After playing a bit with ctrl tables (thought about additional
> mapping set or say new sysctl helper structure, or even using
> extra1 member from struct ctl_table as temporary index) -- 
> you were right in your first propose on this patch. Iterative
> fasion is only more or less convenient here indeed :)
> 
> Patrick, take a look please on the snippet below (that is how
> it looks now).
> ...

> +	for (i = SCTP_CONNTRACK_CLOSED; i < SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX; i++)
> +		sn->sysctl_table[i - 1].data = &sn->sctp_timeouts[i];

That definitely looks nicer. Does this work (-1) for the other
protocols as well?

> If such an approach is fine -- I will fix the TCP proto
> as well. Btw, this two patches (SCTP and TCP) are only
> involved in such a modification, are there some problems
> with patches for UDP, UDPlite and ICMP protos?

Its better than the macro and I don't really see a better way, so
this is fine with me. About the other patches - I just stopped at
SCTP since it was the first one I truely didn't like :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ