[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49BEB49B.8090602@candelatech.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:20:43 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: e100 firmware in 2.6.29-rc7?
Dan Williams wrote:
>> Well, that's an annoyance. Would it be that hard to allow modular drivers
>> to compile-in their FW as well? It would be a nice option for
>> those of us trying to build portable pre-compiled kernels for various
>> distributions and distribution versions.
>
> Most of those distros will have firmware loading capability though,
> right? Every non-embedded distro (Fedora, RHEL, SUSE, Ubuntu,
> Slackware, Mandriva, Xandros, etc) has it, so if you're building kernels
> for those, there's not really a problem with dropping firmware into the
> firmware directory for that distro, right?
No, but figuring out the problem from a customer's bug report ("nothing works")
and then finding the firmware and having the customer install it will be much
worse than just having everything work like it used to.
I just see zero benefits to having external firmware
for the vast majority of end-users, and lots of downside
for at least myself.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists