[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49BF720C.2010603@netfilter.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:49:00 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Holger Eitzenberger <holger@...zenberger.org>
CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] netfilter: ctnetlink allocation improvement
Hi Holger,
Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> what follows is a small patchset against net-next-2.6 which tries to
> improve the way ctnetlink events are allocated. By allocating the
> ctnetlink skbs roughly the size of the message we prevent the skb from
> later being reallocated in netlink_trim().
I have a similar patch here that I sent time ago, I'll send it again, I
think that we can merge your patches and mine.
> Though I haven't got any hard performance numbers yet I think this
> might introduce a noticable performance gain.
I'm not sure about this. Instead, I noticed with oprofile that we spend
more cycles to calculate the message size. I think it's more like a
trade-off, reducing the message size to what we need reduces the chances
to hit ENOBUFS.
> I also have to introduce NF_CT_HELPER_NAME_LEN as an upper limit for
> the conntrack protcol helper names, which is not much of a problem
> because all names in mainline are actually shorter than that.
I'm fine with the helper size change. Actually the current size of 30
bytes doesn't make too much sense.
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists