netdev - Re: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: DMA-API: device driver tries to free DMA memory it has not allocated [device address=0x0000000052ff084a] [size=90 bytes]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:53:13 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc:	Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
	"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
	"e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: DMA-API: device driver tries to free DMA
	memory it has not allocated [device address=0x0000000052ff084a]
	[size=90 bytes]


* Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/2/318
> > > 
> > > We are still looking for more testing from the general community of 
> > > this patch, in particular if any tx hangs are reported.  Thanks in 
> > > advance for any reports.--
> > 
> > Yeah - already picked it up into tip:out-of-tree and it passed about 
> > a hundred bootup tests on various e1000e using systems already - 
> > with no problems whatsoever. Will let you know if anything breaks - 
> > e1000e has been rock solid for me in the .29 cycle.
> 
> thanks! did you pull in both e1000 and e1000e fixes?  We also have a 
> similar fix in internal testing for igb.

yeah, i picked up both - albeit i've switched over all boxes to 
e1000e so e1000 will get little testing from me. Do you have an sha1 
for the igb fix by any chance?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html