netdev - Re: High contention on the sk_buff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:10:33 -0700
From:	Vernon Mauery <vernux@...ibm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	andi@...stfloor.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock

David Miller wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:54:37 +0100
> 
>> But then again I'm not sure it's  worth it if the problem only
>> happens in out of tree RT.
> 
> The list of problems that only show up with the RT kernel seems to be
> constantly increasing, but honestly is very surprising to me.
> 
> I don't understand why we even need to be concerned about this stuff
> upstream, to be honest.
> 
> Please reproduce this in the vanilla kernel, then get back to us.

Huh? The numbers that I posted *were* from the vanilla kernel. I ran
the 2.6.29-rc8 kernel with lock_stat enabled.  The lock contention
happens on the same lock in both vanilla and -rt, it just happens
to be more pronounced in the -rt kernel because of the double context
switches that the sleeping spinlock/rt-mutexes introduce.

--Vernon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html