[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090318162928.163a2408@nehalam>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:29:28 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iproute2: prints bogus hoplimit
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:35:12 +0100 (CET)
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 2009-03-18 23:12, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:27:52 +0100 (CET)
> >Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de> wrote:
> >
> >> $ ip -6 r
> >> fc00::/7 dev rtl0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440
> >> hoplimit 4294967295
> >>
> >> Most likely, "hoplimit -1" would be the right number, though I am not
> >> sure if simply changing %u by %d is a correct thing to do, since it
> >> would affect all fields.
> >>
> >> ---
> >> ip/iproute.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >> if (i != RTAX_RTT && i != RTAX_RTTVAR &&
> >> i != RTAX_RTO_MIN)
> >> - fprintf(fp, " %u", *(unsigned*)RTA_DATA(mxrta[i]));
> >> + fprintf(fp, " %d", *(unsigned*)RTA_DATA(mxrta[i]));
> >
> >No fix the kernel please.
> >
> And what should the kernel return?
The issue is that the hoplimit metric in ipv6 gets converted
to -1 (if it is zero on the incoming route request)..
int ip6_route_add(struct fib6_config *cfg)
{
...
if (dst_metric(&rt->u.dst, RTAX_HOPLIMIT) == 0)
rt->u.dst.metrics[RTAX_HOPLIMIT-1] = -1;
What should happen is when ip6 returns the route back
on the dump request (rt6_fill_node), it should translate the -1 back to 0
to keep it symmetrical and logical. The metrics are unsigned.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists