[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090318.180644.37715957.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: jengelh@...ozas.de, stephen.hemminger@...tta.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iproute2: prints bogus hoplimit
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:01:06 -0700
> if I create route with:
> ip route add ... hoplimit 0
> then to do
> ip route show
> one would expect the hoplimit in the show to match the add ??
> Whether the kernel fudges it in rt6_fill or utility has special case
> code really doesn't matter.
Even if the kernel should change, the tool should behave correctly
for all existing Linux kernels out there so you'd need the iproute2
hack anyways.
> The correct patch in utility would be something like:
Sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists