[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1237469761.6926.47.camel@hermosa>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:36:01 -0600
From: "Peter W. Morreale" <pmorreale@...ell.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Vernon Mauery <vernux@...ibm.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 06:59 -0600, Peter W. Morreale wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 21:54 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Vernon Mauery <vernux@...ibm.com> writes:
> > >
>
> >
> > But then again I'm not sure it's worth it if the problem only
> > happens in out of tree RT.
> >
>
> Heh. That darn bastard child again, eh? :-)
>
>
> Recall that adaptive spin,developed in RT, is now in mainline.
>
Err.. correction... *about* to be in mainline. Only point I'm making
is that RT does implicitly, if not explicitly, contributes to mainline.
Its not a one-way street.
Best,
-PWM
> Best,
> -PWM
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists