netdev - Re: socket api problem: can't bind an ipv6 socket to ::ffff:0.0.0.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jarkao2@...il.com
Cc:	brian.haley@...com, felix-kernel@...e.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: socket api problem: can't bind an ipv6 socket to ::ffff:0.0.0.0

From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:53:00 +0100

> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:36:35PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> ...
> > And yes we should advise people what is an appropriate way to
> > accomplish some task.  If we aren't the experts on such a topic,
> > then who the hell is?
> 
> Only if sb. is looking for advice; otherwise it's not very nice,
> especially if repeated many times.

If the purpose of the query was to suggest that Linux should behave a
certain way, it should be no surprise to anyone that if we should
disagree with that suggestion we would suggest what we consider more
desriable alternatives for the application developer.

I don't even think this is worth the time we are spending to discuss
it, it seems so straightforward.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html