netdev - Re: [PATCH] gianfar: pass the proper dev to DMA ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090318.232835.178183479.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	galak@...nel.crashing.org
Cc:	afleming@...escale.com, becky.bruce@...escale.com,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gianfar: pass the proper dev to DMA ops

From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:16:07 -0500

> We need to be passing the of_platform device struct into the DMA ops as
> its the one that has the archdata setup to know which low-level DMA ops we
> should be using (not the net_device one).  This isn't an issue until we
> expect the archdata to be setup correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
> ---
> 
> Dave,
> 
> This is for net-next.  We are working on having per device dma ops for .30 and
> expect the struct device archdata to be setup properly but in .29 we still
> default to a direct DMA ops on ppc32 so this "bug" will never show up.

Applied to net-next-2.6, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html